Charles Broom vs Patrick Zahraj Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• How does second serve performance affect the match outcome? In recent form, Charles Broom has won 43.13% of second serve points, slightly outperforming Patrick Zahraj, who stands at 40.97%.
• Return game strength can heavily influence match dynamics. Charles Broom has an edge in returning second serves, with a success rate of 46.06%, compared to Patrick Zahraj's 45.39%.
• First serve returns show Broom at 27.61%, outperforming Zahraj at 25.20%. Could this stat suggest an advantage for Broom in gaining control of rallies?
• Under pressure, Zahraj excels by saving 56.59% of breakpoints, compared to Broom's 53.27%. Which player might handle critical moments better?
• In the past year, Broom had a win rate of 61.82%, while Zahraj achieved 51.95%, indicating a potential upper hand for Broom.
• Best career surfaces: Broom shows strength on Clay with a 67% win rate, while Zahraj is most successful on I.hard at the same percentage. This may indicate surface preferences affecting performance.
• At the professional level, Broom has dominated Futures/ITF $10K matches with a 79.41% win rate, whereas Zahraj has a 52.83% win rate primarily in Challengers/ITF > $10K.
• In direct head-to-head encounters, they are evenly matched with one victory each, suggesting a potential close contest.
• Their match history shows average durability, with contests lasting around 1 hour and 25 minutes.
• Both players have faced opponents of similar average ranks over the past year, indicating balanced competition levels.
• Deciding set performance favors Zahraj, who has a 52% win rate compared to Broom's 47%, possibly indicating a stronger resolve in tight situations.

Editorial Prediction (November 13, 2025, UTC):

Analyzing the head-to-head statistics provides a compelling narrative for the upcoming tennis match. Charles Broom shows a slight edge in second serve performance and first serve returns, which could significantly impact the match dynamics. His recent stronger win rate and experience on Futures/ITF $10K tournaments suggest a consistency that may serve him well.

Patrick Zahraj, on the other hand, displays remarkable breakpoint-saving ability and a higher deciding set success rate, potentially giving him an advantage in crucial moments of the match. His greater exposure in Challengers may also present valuable experience against higher-ranked opposition.

While both players have evenly shared previous encounters, the predicted pattern leans slightly towards Charles Broom to seize victory given his superior recent win percentage and service return statistics. Thus, Broom is anticipated to emerge as the likely winner of this contest.